Latest article
3 mins read
Remote Retros Don't Have to Suck
Remote retrospectives fail for predictable reasons.
Read articleSprintPulse blog
Notes on facilitation, action items, AI summaries, psychological safety, and the habits that keep teams from having the same retro twice.
Latest article
3 mins read
Remote retrospectives fail for predictable reasons.
Read article
3 mins read
A retrospective can feel productive and still change nothing.
Read article
4 mins read
Most bad retros do not fail in a dramatic way. People still join the call. Notes still get written. Someone still says "good discussion" at the end.
Read article
3 mins read
Startups often avoid retrospectives because the word sounds heavy. It suggests a calendar invite, a board, a facilitator, a long debate and a set of actions nobody will touch...
Read article
4 mins read
Anonymous feedback has a place in retrospectives. It can give people enough cover to say the thing everyone is thinking, especially when trust is thin.
Read article
5 mins read
AI has arrived in retrospective tools, which means the claims can get silly fast.
Read article
4 mins read
Retrospectives can use different formats. The opening should not change much.
Read article
5 mins read
A team can run a retrospective every sprint and still fail to improve.
Read article
5 mins read
If one person runs every retrospective, the team learns to treat the retro as that person's meeting.
Read article
4 mins read
Google Docs are useful for notes. They are a bad place to manage retro action items.
Read article
4 mins read
A retro tool can look busy and still fail the team.
Read article
4 mins read
Every useful sprint retrospective starts with a small act of trust.
Read article
4 mins read
The release is late. A production bug is still open. Support is waiting for an answer. Someone looks at the calendar and asks the question everyone expected:
Read article
4 mins read
If you had to choose one retrospective format for ordinary sprint work, choose Plus/Delta.
Read article
4 mins read
Google's Project Aristotle looked at why some teams worked well together while others struggled. The public write-up is still worth reading because it moved the focus away from...
Read article
5 mins read
Look at the next retrospective as if you were watching it for the first time.
Read article
4 mins read
You open your retro tool and get a wall of templates.
Read article
5 mins read
Every team has a place where retro action items go to disappear.
Read article
5 mins read
A bad retrospective has a rhythm you can recognise before the first card is written.
Read articleWe use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.